ASN Report 2018

Radiological impact of BNIs since 2012 calculated by the licensees on the basis of the actual discharges from the installations and for the most exposed reference groups (data provided by the nuclear licensees). LICENSEE/SITE REFERENCE GROUP MOST EXPOSED IN 2017 DISTANCE TO SITE IN KM ESTIMATION OF RECEIVED DOSES, IN MSV(A) (The values calculated by the licensee are rounded up to the next higher unit) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Andra / CSA CD24 2.1 1.10 ‑5 1.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 Andra’s Manche repository Hameau de La Fosse 2.5 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 Framatome Romans Ferme Riffard 0.2 6.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑5 Orano Cycle / La Hague Digulleville 2.8 9.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 Orano / Tricastin (Areva NC, Comurhex, Eurodif, Socatri, SET) Les Girardes 1.2 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 CEA / Cadarache (b) Saint-Paul-lez-Durance 5 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑3 1.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 CEA / Fontenay‑aux‑Roses  (b) Achères 30 3.10 ‑5 3.10 ‑5 1.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 <2.10 ‑4 <2.10 ‑4 CEA / Grenoble  (c) - - 2.10 ‑8 5.10 ‑9 (c) (c) (c) (c) CEA / Marcoule (b) (Atalante, Centraco, Phénix, Melox, CIS bio) Codolet 2 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑5 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 CEA / Saclay  (b) Le Christ de Saclay 1 1.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 EDF / Belleville‑sur‑Loire Beaulieu‑sur‑Loire 1.8 8.10 ‑4 7.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 EDF / Blayais Braud et Saint‑Louis 2.5 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 6.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Bugey Vernas 1.8 6.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Cattenom Koenigsmacker 4.8 3.10 ‑3 5.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑3 7.10 ‑3 9.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑3 EDF / Chinon La Chapelle‑sur‑Loire 1.6 5.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Chooz Chooz 1.5 9.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 7.10 ‑4 6.10 ‑4 6.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Civaux Valdivienne 1.9 9.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑4 EDF / Creys‑Malville Creys‑Mépieu 0.95 7.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑6 3.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 EDF / Cruas‑Meysse Savasse 2.4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Dampierre‑en‑Burly Lion‑en‑Sulias 1.6 1.10 ‑3 9.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 EDF / Fessenheim Nambshein 3.5 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑5 4.10 ‑5 3.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑5 EDF / Flamanville Flamanville 0.8 6.10 ‑4 7.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Golfech Golfech 1 7.10 ‑4 6.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Gravelines Gravelines 1.8 4.10 ‑4 6.10 ‑4 8.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 EDF / Nogent‑sur‑Seine Saint‑Nicolas‑la‑Chapelle 2.3 6.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑3 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 7.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 EDF / Paluel Saint‑Sylvain 1.4 5.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 EDF / Penly Biville‑sur‑Mer 2.8 6.10 ‑4 7.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 EDF / Saint‑Alban/ Saint-Maurice Saint‑Pierre‑de‑Bœuf 2.3 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Saint‑Laurent‑des‑Eaux Saint‑Laurent‑Nouan 2.3 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 EDF / Tricastin Bollène 1.3 7.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 Ganil / Caen IUT 0.6 <3.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑3 ILL / Grenoble Fontaine (gaseous discharges) and Saint-Égrève (liquids) 1 et 1.4 1.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑5 (a) Until 2008, for installations operated by EDF, only “adult” figures were calculated. From 2010 to 2012, the dose of the most exposed reference group of each site for the two age classes (adult or infant) is mentioned. As of 2013, the dose of the reference group is provided for three age classes (adult, child, infant) for all the BNIs. The dose value indicated is the harshest value in the age classes. (b) For the Cadarache, Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses and Marcoule sites, the dose estimates entered in the table are the sum of the dose estimates transmitted by CEA. As these estimates comprise at least one term of less than 0.01 microsieverts, the values indicated are preceded by the “less than (<)” sign. (c) As the site has no longer had radioactive discharges since 2014, the radiological impact caused by radioactive discharges has been and continues to be nil since 2014. Table 7 ASN report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2018  147 03 – REGULATION OF NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES AND EXPOSURE TO IONISING RADIATION 03