ASN Report 2020

TABLE 4 Radiological impact of BNIs since 2014 calculated by the licensees on the basis of the actual discharges from the installations and for the most exposed reference groups (data provided by the nuclear licensees) LICENSEES/SITE REFERENCE GROUP MOST EXPOSED IN 2019 DISTANCE TO SITE IN KM ESTIMATION OF RECEIVED DOSES, IN mSv (a) (the values calculated by the licensee are rounded up to the next higher unit) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Andra / CSA Multi-activity group Ville‑aux‑Bois 1.7 2.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 2.10 ‑6 3.10 ‑7 3.10 ‑7 Andra's Manche repository Hameau de La Fosse 2.5 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 Framatome Romans Ferme Riffard 0.2 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑5 3.10 ‑5 Orano Cycle / La Hague Digulleville 2.8 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 2.10 ‑2 Orano / Tricastin (Areva NC, Comurhex, Eurodif, Socatri, SET) Les Girardes 1.2 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑5 8.10 ‑5 CEA / Cadarache (b) Saint‑Paul‑lez‑Durance 5 2.10 ‑3 1.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <3.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 CEA / Fontenay‑aux‑Roses (b) Achères 30 1.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 <2.10 ‑4 <2.10 ‑4 <2.10 ‑4 <2.10 ‑4 CEA / Grenoble (c) - ‑ (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) CEA / Marcoule (b) (Atalante, Centraco, Phénix, Melox, CIS bio) Codolet 2 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑5 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 CEA / Saclay (b) Le Christ de Saclay 1 2.10 ‑3 2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <4.10 ‑3 EDF / Belleville‑sur‑Loire Beaulieu‑sur‑Loire 1.8 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Blayais Braud et Saint‑Louis 2.5 6.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Bugey Vernas 1.8 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Cattenom Koenigsmacker 4.8 8.10 ‑3 7.10 ‑3 9.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑3 9.10 ‑3 1.10 ‑2 EDF / Chinon La Chapelle‑sur‑Loire 1.6 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Chooz Chooz 1.5 7.10 ‑4 6.10 ‑4 6.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 EDF / Civaux Valdivienne 1.9 8.10 ‑4 9.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑4 8.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑3 EDF / Creys‑Malville Creys‑Mépieu 0.95 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑6 3.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑5 EDF / Cruas‑Meysse Savasse 2.4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑3 3.10 ‑4 EDF / Dampierre‑en‑Burly Lion‑en‑Sulias 1.6 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 EDF / Fessenheim Rheinwartenhaus 1.3 4.10 ‑5 4.10 ‑5 3.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑5 5.10 ‑5 4.10 ‑5 EDF / Flamanville Flamanville 0.8 5.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 7.10 ‑5 EDF / Golfech Valence 3.4 2.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 EDF / Gravelines Grand‑Fort‑Philippe 2.5 8.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 8.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑3 EDF / Nogent‑sur‑Seine Saint‑Nicolas‑la‑Chapelle 2.3 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 7.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Paluel Paluel 1.1 9.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 EDF / Penly Berneval‑le‑Grand 3.1 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑4 4.10 ‑4 EDF / Saint‑Alban Saint‑Maurice‑l’Exil 1.7 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 3.10 ‑4 EDF / Saint‑Laurent‑des‑Eaux Lestiou 1.7 2.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 1.10 ‑4 EDF / Tricastin Bollène 1.3 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 Ganil / Caen IUT 0.6 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 <2.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑3 8.10 ‑3 7.10 ‑3 ILL / Grenoble Fontaine (gaseous discharges) and Saint‑Égrève (liquids) 1 and 1.4 3.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 2.10 ‑4 5.10 ‑5 2.10 ‑5 3.10 ‑5 (a) For the installations operated by EDF, only the “adult” values were calculated until 2008. From 2010 to 2012, the dose of the most exposed reference group of each site for the two age classes (adult or baby) is mentioned. As from 2013, the dose of the reference group is provided for three age classes (adult, child, infant) for all the BNIs. The dose value indicated is the harshest value in the age classes. (b) For the Cadarache, Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses and Marcoule sites, the dose estimates entered in the table are the sum of the dose estimates transmitted by the CEA. As these estimates comprise at least one term of less than 0.01 microsieverts, the values indicated are preceded by the “less than (<)” sign. (c) As the site has no longer had radioactive discharges since 2014, the radiological impact caused by radioactive discharges has been nil since 2014. 114 ASN Report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2020 01 – NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES: IONISING RADIATION AND HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS