A 17 February 2010 Circular from the Ministry responsible for the environment concerning the control of activities in the vicinity of BNIs liable to present dangers off the site asked the Prefects to exercise increased vigilance with regard to urban development in the vicinity of nuclear facilities. This Circular states that the greatest possible attention must be paid to projects that are sensitive owing to their size, their purpose, or the difficulties they could entail in terms of protection of the general public in the “reflex” zone. ASN is consulted on construction or urban development projects situated within this zone. The opinions issued are based on the principles explained in ASN Guide No.15 on the control of activities around BNIs published in 2016. This Guide, drawn up by a pluralistic working group jointly overseen by ASN and the General Directorate for Risk Prevention (DGPR), comprising elected officials and the National Association of Local Information Commissions and Committees (Anccli), has the following basic objectives: ∙ preserve the operational nature of the contingency plans; ∙ give priority to regional development outside the “reflex” zone; ∙ allow controlled development that meets the needs of the resident population. 1.2 The emergency situation stakeholders The response by the public authorities to a major nuclear or radiological accident is determined by a number of texts concerning nuclear safety, radiation protection, public order and civil protection, as well as by the emergency plans. Act 2004-811 of 13 August 2004 on the Modernisation of Civil Protection, makes provision for an updated inventory of risks, an overhaul of operational planning, performance of exercises involving the general public, information and training of the general public, an operational watching brief and alert procedures. Several Decrees implementing this Act, codified in Articles L. 741-1 to L. 741-32 of the Domestic Security Code, more spe– cifically concerning the Orsec plans and PPIs, clarified it in 2005. How radiological emergency situations are dealt with is specified in the Interministerial Directive of 7 April 2005 on the action of the public authorities in the case of an event leading to a radiological emergency situation (see Diagram 1). Thus, at the national level, ASN is an active participant in interministerial work on nuclear emergency management. The Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident showed that it was nec– essary to improve preparation for the occurrence of a multifaceted accident (natural disaster, accident affecting several facilities simultaneously). The response organisations thus put into place must be robust and capable of managing a large-scale emergency over a long period of time. Better advance planning must be carried out for work done under ionising radiation and, in order to provide effective support for the country affected, international relations must be improved. 1.2.1 Local response organisation In an emergency situation, several parties have the authority to take decisions: ∙ The licensee of the affected nuclear facilities deploys the response organisation and the resources defined in its PUI (see point 1.1.1). ∙ ASN has a duty to monitor the licensee’s actions in terms of nuclear safety and radiation protection. In an emergency situation, it calls on assessments by IRSN and can at any time ask the licensee to perform any assessments and take any actions it deems necessary. ∙ The Prefect of the département in which the installation is located takes the necessary decisions to protect the population, the environment and the property threatened by the accident. Within the framework of the PPI, this comprises the Orsec plans or the Off-site Protection Plan (PPE) in the event of a malicious act. The Prefect is thus responsible for coordinating the resources –both public and private, human and material– deployed in the PPI. He/she keeps the population and the mayors informed of events. ASN assists the Prefect with managing the situation. ∙ The Prefect of the defence and security zone is responsible for coordinating reinforcements and the support needed by the Prefect of the département, for ensuring that the steps taken between départements are consistent, and for coordinating regional and national communications. ∙ Owing to his or her role in the local community, the Mayor has an important part to play in anticipating and supporting the measures to protect the population. To this end, the mayor of a municipality included within the scope of application of a PPI must draw up and implement a local safeguard plan to provide for, organise and structure the measures to accompany the Prefect’s decisions. The Mayor also plays a role in relaying the information and heightening population awareness, more particularly during iodine tablet distribution campaigns. 1.2.2 National response organisation In a radiological emergency situation, each Ministry –together with the decentralised State services– is responsible for preparing and executing national level measures within their field of competence. In the event of a major crisis requiring the coordination of numerous players, a governmental crisis organisation is set up, under the supervision of the Prime Minister, with activation of the CIC. The purpose of this Committee is to centralise and analyse information, in order to prepare the strategic decisions and coordinate their implementation at interministerial level. It comprises: ∙ all the Ministries concerned; ∙ the competent safety Authority and its technical support organisation, IRSN; ∙ representatives of the licensee; ∙ administrations or public institutions providing assistance, such as Météo-France (national weather service). 1.3 Protecting the population The steps to protect the populations during the emergency phase, as well as the initial actions as part of the post-accident phase, aim to protect the population from exposure to ionising radiation and to any chemical and toxic substances that may be present in the releases. These measures are mentioned in the PPIs. 1.3.1 General protection measures In the event of a major nuclear or radiological accident, a number of measures can be envisaged by the Prefect, in order to protect the population: ∙ Sheltering and awaiting instructions: the individuals concerned, alerted by a siren, take shelter at home or in a building, with all openings closed, and wait for instructions from the Prefect broadcast by the media. ∙ Ingesting stable iodine tablets (only in the event of an accident involving radioactive iodine releases): when ordered by the Prefect, the individuals liable to be exposed to releases of radioactive iodine are urged to take the prescribed dose of iodine tablets. ∙ Evacuation: in the event of a risk of large-scale radioactive releases, the Prefect may order evacuation. The populations ASN Report on the state of nuclear safety and radiation protection in France in 2021 171 04 – RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY AND POST-ACCIDENT SITUATIONS 08 07 13 04 10 06 12 14 03 09 05 11 02 01 AP
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NjQ0NzU=