- 213 - Complementary safety assessments carried out in 2012 Licensee Site Facility Type Rapsodie Experimental reactor MCMF Storage of material LECA Research laboratory CHICADE Research facility CABRI Experimental reactor PEGASE Storage facility for nuclear fuel and radioactive waste (Pu drums) Storage yard Waste storage Cadarache Site support function Saclay Orphée Experimental reactor Atalante Research laboratory CEA Marcoule Site support functions AREVA Romans FBFC CERCA plant Fuel production CIS BIO International Saclay CIS BIO plant (BNI 29) Radionuclide production plant Creys Malville Superphénix, including TNA APEC Fast-neutron reactor (shut down) Bugey Bugey 1 Reactor under decommissioning Reactor under decommissioning Reactor under decommissioning Chinon Chinon A1 Chinon A2 Chinon A3 Reactor under decommissioning Saint-Laurent A1 Reactor under decommissioning Saint-Laurent Saint-Laurent A2 Reactor under decommissioning Chooz Chooz A Reactor under decommissioning EDF Facilities under decommissioning Brennilis Monts dArrée-EL4D (BNI 162) Reactor under decommissioning ITER ORGANIZATION Cadarache ITER Research facility Specific case of waste repositories and waste disposal facility projects In view of the approach adopted to prioritise the facilities, the disposal facilities [the Manche waste repository (CSM) currently in long-term monitoring phase, and the Aube waste repository (CSA) in operation, dedicated to the disposal of low- and medium activity short-lived waste] were placed in category 3, given the criteria defined for the CSAs (potential source term, seismic risk, flood risk, loss of electrical power supplies, loss of heat sink, emergency situation management). Furthermore, concerning the design of the structures of these same facilities, complementary studies are either being examined (as is the case with the earthquake resistance of equipment in the CSA waste conditioning unit) or will be provided in the framework of the review follow-up (as is the case with changes to be made in the CSM's surface cap). ASN will examine the files when it receives them. Lastly, facilities projected for the future must be designed taking account of the experience feedback from the Fukushima accident. ASN has made the request to Andra which will adopt it in the functional requirements for the future drafts of the CIGEO file (disposal facility project for high- and mediumactivity long-lived waste). This point will receive particular attention when examining risk control. As regards the disposal facility project for low-level long-lived waste (LLW-LL), the request has been made and this question will be examined when the project is at a more advanced stage of development. The remainder of this chapter only addresses the priority facilities other than the nuclear power reactors that underwent a complementary safety assessment in 2011. It presents the first conclusions from the reviews conducted by ASN, with the support of the IRSN, on the basis of the complementary safety assessment (CSA) reports submitted by the licensees in 2011. It constitutes the first step in a long experience feedback integration process. As regards the first conclusions, deadline dates for the measures requested by ASN are generally not specified, as more detailed discussions must be held with the licensees in order to confirm them.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NjQ0NzU=